Facebook
In a time of dwindling conservation dollars, precious resources used to defend against the IRS’ abusive war on conservation easements will lead to less protected land. The Land Trust Alliance’s stance on the case puts them on the wrong side of conservation history.
Judge Holmes’ dissent details the onslaught of abuses from the IRS that obstruct conservation easements and hurt conservation efforts throughout the United States.
"States in the South that were identified as having a high degree of threat and low policy response include TX, GA, KY, TN, SC, AL, MI, and LA. There is a particularly critical need for state policymakers to act in these states." Read more via American Farmland Trust:
In a time of dwindling conservation dollars, precious resources used to defend against the IRS’ abusive war on conservation easements will lead to less protected land. The Land Trust Alliance’s stance on the case puts them on the wrong side of conservation history.
Judge Holmes’ dissent details the onslaught of abuses from the IRS that obstruct conservation easements and hurt conservation efforts throughout the United States.
"States in the South that were identified as having a high degree of threat and low policy response include TX, GA, KY, TN, SC, AL, MI, and LA. There is a particularly critical need for state policymakers to act in these states." Read more via American Farmland Trust: